Do you need UDO?

If you can answer one or more of the following question with Yes UDO should be worth to take a look at. If you cannot answer any question with Yes it is quite possible that you don't need UDO and that you can stop reading this manual right here.

• Have you written a text with a general contents and do you want to let some people, that don't run the same operating system, read it?
• Are you a programmer and do you want to distribute your software with an plain text manual (ASCII) and an online manual for Windows, Apple Help Book, Turbo Vision, GNU Info or ST-Guide?
• Are you a programmer and do you want to print out the manual with LaTeX or with a text processor that can import the Rich Text Format?
• Do you only need an plain text (ASCII) manual but you always get rid of checking the line breaks, chapter numbers and the table of contents?
• Do you want to publish a hypertext inside the World Wide Web but you don't own a powerful HTML editor that can enter links, convert special characters or split up the document into different files automatically?
• Do you want to make an online manual for a Windows software but you don't want to pay for a software that can do only a little bit more than UDO?
• Are you the author of a Pure C library for the Atari computers and you need a descriptions of the library routines for Pure C Help and ST-Guide?

Did you answer any question with Yes? Fine! You didn't? Then read the questions once more. ;-)